| Type of Case |
Brief Description of Representation |
Results |
Construction Law |
Our firm represented the owners of an investment property whose general contractor breached the construction contract.
|
The defendant refused to make any offer of settlement. In arbitration under the AAA Construction Industry Arbitration Rules, the arbitrator awarded our clients over $52,000 in damages for the general contractor's breach of contract.
|
Automobile personal injury |
Our firm represented a female who was injured when an automobile driven by the defendant struck her The client's leg was broken.
|
We obtained a settlement on behalf of our client including the full $100,000 amount available under the defendant's automobile liability policy, plus an additional out-of-pocket cash payment from the defendant of $35,000; written representations and warranties (verified by a private financial investigator hired by the firm) that defendant had no other assets upon which the client could execute; plus a policy limit payment of $25,000 from the underinsured motorist carrier of the client for a total recovery of $160,000.
|
Automobile personal injury |
We represented a female who was injured when an automobile driven by the defendant struck a vehicle in which the client was a passenger. Our client suffered a head injury resulting in neuropsychological deficits.
|
After filing suit and extensively preparing the case, we obtained a settlement on behalf of our client of payment of full policy limits available from the liability insurance carrier of the defendant, plus payment of full policy limits available from the underinsured motorist insurer of our clients, plus waiver of PIP lien.
|
Automobile personal injury |
We represented a male who was injured in a rear-end collision caused by an employee of a construction company. Our client alleged permanent soft tissue injury to his back.
|
The defendants' last offer before trial was $8,000. The firm tried the case before a 12-person jury in King County.
The jury returned a verdict in favor of our client in excess of $66,000. The trial judge's staff informed the attorney after the verdict was returned that, at the time, the verdict was the largest that had been returned in that judge's courtroom for a soft tissue injury case.
|